How Ernest Jones's Week 1 Tackles Reveal Seattle's Coverage Plan

Ernest Jones's underneath tackles reveal Seattle's plan: concede the short pass, ambush everything deeper.

Table of Content

Seattle beat New England 13-10 in Week 1, a game that will mostly be remembered — if it's remembered at all — as an ugly opener between two teams still figuring themselves out. That's the wrong reason to go back and watch it. The right reason is that in one game, Mike Macdonald's defense produced an unusually clean example of what his coverage is designed to do: give up the short throw, then take away everything behind it.

What happened to Drake Maye, in two buckets

Drake Maye threw 33 passes with a recorded air-yards value against Seattle. Split them at 10 air yards and the two halves barely look like the same offense.

Depth Att Comp Yds INT EPA/play
Short (≤9 air yards) 23 20 134 0 +0.30
Intermediate+ (10+ AY) 10 3 44 3 −0.96

Twenty-of-23 for 134 yards at +0.30 EPA/play is a functional NFL passing game. Three-of-10 for 44 yards with three interceptions at −0.96 EPA/play is a disaster. Seattle spent the game conceding the first row of the field and confiscating the second — and it worked, in one game, against one opponent. Keep that caveat in mind for the rest of this piece.

The interceptions were exactly who you'd expect

Look at who caught the three balls and where they caught them:

  • Nehemiah Pritchett, nickel, on a 42-air-yard shot intended for Romeo Doubs — a deep-half takeaway.
  • Julian Love, safety, on a 25-air-yard throw intended for DeMario Douglas over the middle — a deep-middle takeaway.
  • Josh Jobe, cornerback, on a 16-air-yard throw down the right side intended for Mack Hollins, ruled a touchback at the Seattle 3 — a boundary takeaway in the red zone.

Three interceptions, three different secondary players, all on throws of 16 air yards or deeper. These weren't lucky tips; they were defenders sitting on routes at the exact depth the coverage was built to squeeze.

Ernest Jones did the underneath work

The other half of a funnel defense is the linebacker who isn't being tested deep, because his job is to make the short completions cost as much as possible after the catch. Ernest Jones led Seattle with 8 solo tackles in the game. Five of those came on completed passes, at an average depth of just 5.2 air yards — the throws ranged from behind the line of scrimmage out to 9 yards downfield. He wasn't chasing routes into the third level; he was sitting at the intermediate line and cleaning up whatever the coverage funneled underneath him.

The next four Seahawks on the solo-tackle sheet — Pritchett (5), Jobe (5), Uchenna Nwosu (4), Love (4) — are the exact defensive backs and edge player you'd expect to see on a night when the offense was pushed toward the flats and the boundary.

The fingerprint matches Seattle's 2025 season

One game is one game. What makes the Week 1 tape more than a fluke is that it matches a shape Seattle already showed over a full season in 2025.

Seattle led the NFL in pass attempts allowed behind the line of scrimmage in 2025 with 155 — 29 more than the next-closest team, Houston, at 126. New England (118) and a tie between Kansas City and Jacksonville (115 each) rounded out the next tier, with Los Angeles' Chargers close behind at 111. That's not a marginal edge; the gap between Seattle and second place is roughly as large as the gap between second and sixth. Seattle's defense was built, on purpose, to hand the quarterback the checkdown.

What this doesn't prove yet

It's tempting to reach further — to point to Jones's own season-long interception numbers, or to Seattle's year-over-year defensive EPA trend, as more proof the funnel-and-rob concept is paying off leaguewide. Those are real, checkable numbers, but they need their own dedicated look before they go in print; this piece is built on the Week 1 tape and the one season-long numbers we could verify, not on recalled stats. Treat any broader claim about Jones's picks or Seattle's defensive trajectory as a hypothesis worth checking, not a fact reported here.

The more immediate caveat is the sample itself. Seattle held a middling passing offense to 10 points and got a fortunate interception — Jobe's touchback at the Seattle 3 — that easily could have been an incompletion or a completed touchdown instead. New England went 20-of-23 on the easy stuff. Against a better quarterback, that yardage converts into points more often than it did in this game.

What the tape does show, cleanly, is a division of labor: a linebacker cleaning up the short game the defense is designed to concede, while a rotating cast of defensive backs takes away the layer behind him. It's a role you can point at on film. When it works again in a later week, you'll know what you're looking at — and when it doesn't, you'll know which player didn't do his job.

Sign up for Stats Digest newsletters.

Stay up to date with curated collection of our top stories.

Please check your inbox and confirm. Something went wrong. Please try again.

Subscribe to join the discussion.

Please create an account to become a member and join the discussion.

Already have an account? Sign in

Read more

Sign up for Stats Digest newsletters.

Stay up to date with curated collection of our top stories.

Please check your inbox and confirm. Something went wrong. Please try again.