Week 7 Produced One Dominant Passing Game and Not Much Else to Trust Yet

Joe Burrow's +0.587 EPA per dropback against a strong Ravens defense was Week 7's lone proven standout.

Table of Content

Week 7 of the 2026 season is in the books: 14 games, from Thursday's Chicago win over New England to Monday's Dallas blowout in Philadelphia. The league has now played 107 of 272 regular-season games — 39% of the schedule — enough of a baseline that a single week's results can start to be measured against something real. But one week is still roughly 60 plays per team, and most of Sunday's scorelines are just that: clean final numbers that haven't been pulled apart yet. Here is the one result from Week 7 we can say something rigorous about, and an honest accounting of what the rest of the slate does and doesn't tell us.

The one performance that moved the needle: Joe Burrow in Baltimore

Cincinnati beat Baltimore 35-13, and the passing-game split explains almost the entire margin. Burrow went 22-of-31 for 292 yards and four touchdowns, posting +0.587 EPA per dropback across 31 attempts — a total of roughly +18.2 EPA on those plays alone. For comparison, the 2026 league has averaged +0.042 EPA per pass play across 7,627 passes so far this season. Burrow's day was roughly fourteen times that league baseline, sustained over 31 attempts rather than a couple of explosive outliers — which is what makes it a genuinely informative single-game number rather than noise.

The context that sharpens it further: Baltimore's defense had actually been one of the better units in the league through six weeks, allowing -0.033 EPA per play across 372 snaps — stingier than the 2026 league average of +0.008 EPA/play overall. Burrow's afternoon (worth about +16.9 total EPA on 51 Cincinnati snaps) was large enough by itself to drag the Ravens' full-season mark up to +0.011 allowed per play across 423 snaps. That's not a defense that was already struggling getting picked on; that's a defense that had been performing well getting torched by one quarterback in one game.

Baltimore's Tyler Huntley, by contrast, needed 38 dropbacks to produce +0.091 EPA per play (23-of-38, 298 yards, one touchdown) — a middling day that did nothing to keep pace. Cincinnati's own run game was unremarkable (-0.065 EPA per carry on 20 carries), and Baltimore's run game was outright bad (-0.349 EPA per carry on 27 carries). This was a game Cincinnati won almost entirely through the air, against a defense that came in playing well.

What to watch in Week 8

  • Does Burrow's day hold up as a game, or build into a stretch? +0.587 EPA/dropback on 31 attempts is one of the best single-game passing numbers the league will produce all season. One more month of it would be a real story; one more month of Baltimore's defense bouncing back toward its pre-Week-7 form (-0.033 EPA allowed per play) would be, too.
  • Was Kansas City's shutout a defensive statement from Seattle or an off night from an offense that had been performing well? The six-week trend line (+0.155 EPA/play) says Kansas City was fine coming in. The scoreboard says something went wrong on Sunday. Only the play-by-play from that specific game will say which.
  • How much of Week 7's margin around the league was passing-game variance versus real separation? With 39% of the season complete, this is close to the point where six-game and seven-game samples start to mean something — but a single week's scorelines, on their own, are not that evidence.

A closing caveat worth repeating: none of the EPA figures above are opponent-adjusted, and the 2026 league-wide baselines used for comparison (+0.008 EPA/play overall, +0.042 per pass, -0.038 per run, across 13,179 plays so far) are themselves still being built week by week. Treat everything here as what the numbers show happened — not as a verdict on what will.

Sign up for Stats Digest newsletters.

Stay up to date with curated collection of our top stories.

Please check your inbox and confirm. Something went wrong. Please try again.

Subscribe to join the discussion.

Please create an account to become a member and join the discussion.

Already have an account? Sign in

Read more

Sign up for Stats Digest newsletters.

Stay up to date with curated collection of our top stories.

Please check your inbox and confirm. Something went wrong. Please try again.